Article in Folio comparing Open Source CMS environments.

It’s impressive that enterprise publishers, such as Us Magazine are using Drupal. Doesn’t it look great? Notice that they’ve even implemented pop-up windows.

So certainly Drupal provides a capable platform for high-end development. But according to the article Joomla is easier for basic users.

Now, let’s take a look at a Joomla site - Las Vegas Sports Magazine.

It’s very “template-ey”. It’s the current standard vanilla site. This would be poisonous to a world-class brand like Us, but certainly a lot less effort for a smaller publication. When it comes to personal web sites, it appears that Joomla would be the better choice unless you’re going after high concept design.

Another specimen. Please comment if you have any idea what it is. Some kind of beetle?

——————-

And here is the first of my “What Bug Is This” posts. Major props to John McGuire who knew that it was the Giant Leopard Moth.

It looks like Rick’s $1.99 Cleaners on Bee Caves Rd. has now changed their name to Rick’s $2.09 Cleaners. I wonder if they changed the corporate letterhead and web site too!

Conde Nast Portfolio ran a fantastic profile by David Margolick on Schultz in the July issue. In fact, his celebrity has generated a lot of press. Some other articles I’ve seen recently include an explanation of Starbucks’ store closing strategy in Slate, and a preview of their new Clover coffee maker in Wired.

The original Starbucks story is a brilliant tale of outrageous success. CEO Howard Schultz started with coffee - an addictive product. Then he created a market for espresso-based drinks at premium pricing. The company systematically expanded into high-income locales in the US and beyond. Starbucks created an aspirational brand that was strong enough to cross over into the music business. It all fit into the lifestyle they were selling: Upscale, urban, hip, and epicurean.

Overview

When recession hit, expansion slowed, and same-store sales dropped. Even worse, the stock was down 40% and the brand was in trouble. David Margolick quotes an anonymous blog contributor:

” . . . the place has become the McDonald’s of the industry, with worse coffee than McDonald’s itself.”

Schultz’s problem is that he needs to make the Starbucks experience so good that people are happy to pay $4 instead of $1.50 for a cup of traditional coffee. In a recession.

(more…)

Note: This entry is the second part of a series of posts inspired by an amazing article called “The Last Verse” by Burkhard Bilger from the April 28, 2008 edition of The New Yorker. It tells of two musicologists, Lance Ledbetter and Art Rosenbaum who are scouring the country for the last “old time” folk musicians, uninfluenced by recorded music that began spreading in the early 20th century.

When we listen to classic music we often assume this is the greatest music in history and has withstood the test of time. But often the reason that particular music survives is because it was available to the right people at the right time. In every age, works of equal genius to the “classics” have been lost to history.

Johann Sebastian Bach

This almost happened to the music of Johann Sebastian Bach. After his death in 1750, Bach’s reputation declined. His work was hardly ever performed, and he was only known to a few devoted music historians. Granted those devotees were the “hip” crowd of the day, including Mozart and Beethoven, but his work was appreciated only by other musicians, and Bach remained unknown to the general public.

The one who brought Bach back into the public eye was the composer Felix Mendelssohn. His great aunt Sarah had studied under Bach’s son, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, so she had some old manuscripts. Mendelssohn took it upon himself to champion Bach’s work, and in 1829 he conducted the St. Matthew Passion in Berlin for the first time since Bach’s death. It must have been an incredible performance because it’s credited with restoring Bach’s reputation. We listen to Bach today because his old manuscripts turned up in the right place at the right time.

The Legend of Robert Johnson

Here’s a similar story about the great Mississippi bluesman Robert Johnson. When he died in 1938 he had only recorded 35 songs in two sessions in 1936 and 1937, and he sold maybe 5000 records. But one man who had heard of him was John Hammond. He was an impresario who had sought out Johnson in 1938 and eventually booked him for a show at Carnegie Hall in New York City. That might have been Johnson’s big break, but instead Johnson was poisoned in Clarksdale Mississippi by a lover’s jealous husband, and his great talent remained undiscovered.

But Hammond never forgot, and in 1961 he persuaded Columbia Records to issue an album cut from old 78s of Robert Johnson called “King of the Delta Blues Singers”. It didn’t sell very well at first, but a few hipsters caught on to the music early. Among those hipsters were Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, the Rolling Stones, and Led Zeppelin. Now Robert Johnson is considered the greatest bluesman of his day, even though he hardly made it out of juke joints in Memphis and the Mississippi Delta.

Inseperable from the story of Robert Johnson is the famous legend that Robert Johnson met with Satan at the crossroads and signed over his soul to play the blues and gain mastery of the guitar. Few people know that the same story used to be associated with another Mississippi bluesman named Tommy Johnson, who actually was considered the king of the Delta blues back when the two of them were alive. But once again, we listen to Robert Johnson today because his music turned up in the right place at the right time.

If you want to take a taste test, here are some samples of them both - Tommy Johnson here, Robert Johnson here. I’ll take Robert Johnson, but I’m alright with either of them. 

(more…)

As part of my ongoing look at entrepreneurs championing new technologies, I sat down with Internet Radio Expert and entrepreneur Mark Lassoff, VP of Sales and Marketing at NLI Media Group, who heads up their Internet Broadcasting Group.

O J Way: What is Internet radio?

ML: Technically, Internet Radio is the distribution of audio entertainment or informational programming via the Internet. What makes it “radio” is that all of the listeners are hearing the same thing at the same time. That’s what’s known as a single feed, just like a traditional radio station. But of course, you hear different programs or content depending on the time you’re listening.

O J Way: So why is Internet radio better?

ML: The net effect is that Internet radio gives people options they never had with traditional station. People are tired of the same 10 stations playing the same music available in every market. Do you like reggae? There are Internet radio stations that format nothing but Marley. Opera fan? Several choices in Internet radio cater to your tastes.

O J Way: What will you find on Internet radio right now?

ML: Internet radio is about to undergo a major change.

Right now, many traditional radio stations simply rebroadcast their signal through Internet radio. Wrong answer! People aren’t looking for another channel of traditional commercial radio.

Another segment would be hobbyists and DJ wanna-be’s. The quality of a lot of these programs is low. These are vanity productions, but the lower costs of Internet radio can help this channel grow.

The new and, I believe, most important segment of Internet radio broadcasters is traditional advertisers who are developing their own content. Here’s the business opportunity: 57% of weekly Internet radio users report listening while purchasing goods at a website. So Internet radio reaches customers right when they’re at a place where they can make purchasing decisions – namely when they’re online.

O J Way: Who would choose to listen to ads? (more…)